Home   News   National   Article

Archbishop of Canterbury stands by criticism of Government migrant policy


By PA News

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has said the Rwanda migrant scheme will fail (Belinda Jiao/PA)

The Archbishop of Canterbury has said he will continue to speak out against the Government’s migrant policy, as he denied attacking the Home Secretary personally.

Justin Welby faced criticism from Tory MP Jonathan Gullis after he used a speech in the House of Lords to rebuke the Government’s immigration policy and predicted that the Rwanda scheme was destined to fail.

In a wide-ranging interview with Channel 4 News, the Archbishop denied that he had personally attacked Suella Braverman as he insisted he would continue to express his views on what he called a “moral” issue.

“Everything’s a political issue. I mean, absolutely everything,” he said.

Something can be legal and still wrong
Justin Welby

He denied he had used his speech to “lay into” Ms Braverman, saying: “I’ve never laid into the Home Secretary.

“I talk about policy, not people. That would be a welcome change from a lot of politics.”

The Archbishop used his speech in the Lords to warn that “control has become cruelty” while also arguing that the Rwanda scheme would be a failure.

He refused to relent or row back on his remarks, after it was put to him that the High Court had ruled the controversial policy lawful.

The Archbishop told the programme that he would continue to speak out on the issue of migration and asylum policy, adding that he had not been wrong in his views on the plan.

“No, absolutely not.

“We never said it was legal or illegal. We said it’s wrong. Something can be legal and still wrong.”

“I don’t think it will be a success for a lot of reasons,” the Archbishop said.

Earlier this week, Ms Braverman said she was committed to sending migrants to Rwanda as soon as possible after the High Court decision but Downing Street admitted it was impossible to say when flights could take off while the threat of further legal action remained.

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

Keep up-to-date with important news from your community, and access exclusive, subscriber only content online. Read a copy of your favourite newspaper on any device via the HNM App.

Learn more


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More