Home   News   National   Article

Actions of officers before Matt Ratana’s murder not looked at, inquest hears


By PA News

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!

Potential “missed opportunities” to prevent the murder of a police sergeant in a custody cell have not been examined, a coroner reopening an inquest into his death has said.

Matt Ratana, 54, was shot dead with a legally bought revolver in Croydon, south London, on September 25 2020.

Jurors later found gun fanatic Louis de Zoysa, 26, guilty of his murder before he was handed a whole-life order by a judge last month.

South London Coroner’s Court heard on Friday the full inquest into Mr Ratana’s death will begin at the end of October but no final decision was made on whether there will be a jury.

Louis De Zoysa was found guilty of murder (Metropolitan Police/PA)
Louis De Zoysa was found guilty of murder (Metropolitan Police/PA)

A decision to hold the inquest under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which would mean examining whether the state breached its duty to protect the New Zealand-born officer’s right to life, was also postponed.

Senior coroner Sarah Ormond-Walshe said there had not yet been a “substantive hearing” about the “actions of police officers who had contact with Sgt Ratana in the hours preceding his death” and whether there were any “missed opportunities” to prevent it.

Sgt Ratana’s partner Su Bushby watched via video link as lawyers representing the Metropolitan Police were told to provide full disclosure and evidence, including unedited body-worn and CCTV footage, to all interested parties by next month.

Imran Khan KC, who represented De Zoysa during his trial, was also present during the short hearing.

A further pre-inquest review will take place at Croydon Town Hall on September 22, ahead of a three-week full inquest into his death at the same venue from October 30.

The inquest had opened in October 2020 but was adjourned during criminal proceedings.

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

Keep up-to-date with important news from your community, and access exclusive, subscriber only content online. Read a copy of your favourite newspaper on any device via the HNM App.

Learn more


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More