Home   News   National   Article

UK Government spent almost £200,000 defending NI Protocol legal challenges


By PA News

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
The UK and EU have now agreed the Windsor Framework as a way to cut the red tape caused by the existing arrangement (Peter Morrison/PA)

Nearly £200,000 was spent by the UK Government defending two legal challenges to the Northern Ireland Protocol.

One of the cases was brought by unionist politicians and Brexiteers including Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) leader Jim Allister, former Brexit Party MEP Ben Habib and Baroness Kate Hoey, and the other by a loyalist pastor from Belfast, Clifford Peeples.

The Westminster administration’s legal costs were disclosed in a response to a parliamentary written question by former Labour MP Lady Hoey, who sits as a non-affiliated peer in the upper chamber.

The Government has spent £196,567 on fees associated with the legal challenges of Clifford Peeples and Jim Allister and others
Northern Ireland Office minister Lord Caine

Northern Ireland Office minister Lord Caine said: “The Government has spent £196,567 on fees associated with the legal challenges of Clifford Peeples and Jim Allister and others.”

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled last month the controversial post-Brexit trading arrangements in Northern Ireland were lawful.

The joint legal challenge had previously been dismissed by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Belfast.

Attempts to restore powersharing at Stormont have so far failed because of a boycott by the DUP in protest at the protocol, which created trade barriers in the Irish Sea.

The UK and EU have now agreed the Windsor Framework as a way to cut the red tape caused by the existing arrangement.

However, the DUP has said it will vote on Wednesday against the first aspect of the revamped deal to be considered by Parliament, the Stormont brake, which the Government itself has suggested will be indicative of support for the overall agreement.

The mechanism aims to allow assembly members to flag their concerns about new EU legislation that will affect the region.

While the DUP says the framework has gone some way to address its concerns about the protocol, it says some significant problems remain.

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

Keep up-to-date with important news from your community, and access exclusive, subscriber only content online. Read a copy of your favourite newspaper on any device via the HNM App.

Learn more


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More