Home   News   Article

Inverness artist set to appeal refusal of Muir of Ord studio and holiday lodge plan


By Neil MacPhail

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!

AN artist and her husband are taking advice on mounting a “robust appeal” after being refused planning permission for a small self-catering holiday lodge development allied to a new art studio and a three-hole pitch and putt course near Muir of Ord.

The decision, made under delegated powers, halted Louise Innes’ plans to run art workshops at Kilcoy.

Highland Council refused permission for Mrs Innes and husband Alan’s application on 1.45 acres of farm field because “the proposal is located within a currently undeveloped parcel of agricultural land and does not form part of the diversification of an existing agricultural or crofting enterprise”.

There were more than 30 representations both for and against the plan, and VisitScotland said it would be supportive.

Mrs Innes has a shared studio in Inverness but would like to relocate to expand and offer workshops.

She said: “We are obviously disappointed at the decision of the officer. Whilst one previous applicant has indeed made four unsuccessful applications, our application is totally different and clearly allowable under Clause 35 which is promoted by both local and Scottish policies to allow for new businesses in hinterland areas to offer self-catering accommodation, something which is badly needed in Highland region, especially in the aftermath of Covid with the increased demand for staycations.”

She said VisitScotland was “very excited to work with us to promote peaceful, luxury, retreats which are badly needed in our region for various markets such as golfers and artists to share one of the most amazing views in our area”.

She said local disabled-friendly self-catering accommodation “is sadly lacking in both quantity and quality”. Locals and tourists could enjoy a peaceful holiday in a country location whilst still having local shops and services nearby to aid the local economy.

The couple are speaking to planning experts, the Scottish Government and a councillor while considering the best strategy for an appeal.

Each planning authority has a review body to determine requests by applicants to review local applications that have been refused by officers.

Mrs Innes added: “I feel quite strongly about the council policing their own policies. If it went to committee – which I think should have as there were over four objections, the appeal would go to Scottish Government and be independent.”

“We are currently taking advice from various avenues before producing a robust appeal and we are confident that sense will prevail and we can offer a luxury and peaceful self-catering accommodation which complements the already existing and successful self- catering accommodation in that area.”

Mrs Innes added that the rest of their plot is not undeveloped agricultural land as stated in the planning decision and there is already a fruit orchard along with the first phase of vegetable planting with the rest of the land being used for sheep grazing. Their next planned phase is to have free range chickens and honey bees.

A council spokesman said: “For local scale developments, when there are timeous objections from five or more separate households and the application is recommended for approval, it will be referred to committee.

“When the recommendation is to refuse, the local ward members are provided with the case officer’s report and are given the opportunity to call the application to committee for determination. If the application is not called in by two ward members, the application is refused under delegated powers.

“The council has acted in full accordance with its Scheme of Delegation as regards this application. The applicant has the opportunity to request a review of the officer’s decision by the council’s Planning Review Body. It is independent of the Planning Authority.” It is currently composed of eight members.


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More